Obama: Dhimmi Democratic candidate reveals his Muslim Summit Agenda

comment by Jerry Gordon
http://www.actforamerica.org

Senator Barack Obama, who appears to be sprinting in the pre Super Tuesday polls appears to have pulled off a real shocker. He revealed that he is a dhimmi Democrat. In a Paris Match interview yesterday, he indicated that one of the first things that he would do if elected would be to convene a summit with the leaders of the world's Muslim nations and enlist their aid in the war on terrorism.

Here is what Obama said in the Paris Match interview as translated by Reuters.

"Once I'm elected, I want to organize a summit in the Muslim world, with all the heads of state, to have an honest discussion about ways to bridge the gap that grows every day between Muslims and the West," Thursday's edition of Paris Match quoted Obama as saying,

"I want to ask them to join our fight against terrorism. We must also listen to their concerns."

Really. Sounds like appeasement to us. That amounts to letting all of the Islamic camel into the tent to eat our lunch. It's bad enough that we have Cultural Jihad and Sharia finance breaking on these shores, big time. Now, we have a possible presumptive Presidential candidate who doesn't realize that it is not the war of terrorism. It is the war against Political Islam that we are engaged in: the long war. Whether it is Jihad, the tag line from GOP contender Governor Romney,or,the war against radical Islamic extremism of Sen. McCain, at least they 'get it'.

Here's what Matt Brooks of the Republican Jewish Coalition said in a news release, today:

"We are deeply troubled by Senator Obama's desire to 'hold a summit in the Muslim world, with all heads of state' -- many of whom have yet to renounce terrorism or refrain from anti-Semitic incitement," said Brooks. "Nowhere in the Paris Match article does Senator Obama affirm Israel's right to exist. Nor does he condemn the repeated terrorist strikes against Israel -- the only stable democracy in the region."

"Further in his interview, Senator Obama said he wanted to listen to the 'concerns' of these nations. For many, their biggest concern is Israel's existence. It's worrisome that Senator Obama wants to 'listen' to those calling for Israel's destruction. It's also worrisome that he didn't use this interview to call on Muslims to stop teaching hateful anti-Semitic and anti-Israel propaganda in their schools and textbooks."

"By asking Muslim nations, some of whom actively train and fund Hezbollah and Hamas, to 'join our fight against terrorism,' Senator Obama once again demonstrates his shaky foreign policy judgment and raises questions about his commitment to Israel's security. For all those who care about Israel, Senator Obama's Muslim nations summit is a cause for alarm and concern," said Brooks.

So where is Obama getting the idea that he should be engaged in dialogue with Muslims, who hold him and us in contempt, as kaffirs-"unbelievers"? Is it his half brother, a Luo tribesman in Kenya? Or his commiseration with Kenyan opposition leader Raila Odinga who cut a deal with the National Muslim Leaders Forum in Kenya to abet sharia?

At any Summit with leaders of the Organization of Islamic Conference, all they will do is spew out is nothing but taqiyyah-religiously sanctioned dissimilitude and suggest that a 'hudna' or cease fire, is all that is needed. A cease fire so they can regroup and attack us when we least expect it.

Many think that Obama has been listening to his racist and anti-Semitic pastor at the Trinity United Church of Christ who has sucked up to Nation of Islam head Louis Farrakhan and Libya's crazed Muammar Gaddafi.

Perhaps, Obama has been taking advise from foreign policy advisers like the father Zbigniew Brzezinski and son Mark, former President 'Jimma' Carter and Tony Lake, former, Clinton aide. Or perhaps it is the eminence grise financier, hedge fund mogul and anti-US hegemon advocate, George Soros.

As Muslims consider Obama a murtadd or apostate, I wouldn't advise his attending any Muslim summit. They might have Imams, Mullahs and Ayatollahs issue a fatwa against him.

Lights out - more anti-Israel propaganda

Today's headlines include the LA Times's "Gaza dark amid Israeli blockade" and The Guardian's "Gaza plunged into darkness as Israeli fuel blockade takes effect". Similar headlines appear in many media outlets. You could be forgiven for thinking that Israel has cut off the entire electricity supply to the Gaza Strip.

Despite ongoing Qassam attacks from the territory, Israel has not switched off the electricity. In fact, Hamas itself shut down Gaza's only power station after inviting the media to watch it do so.

The mainstream media ultimately assisted Hamas in creating the impression of a humanitarian crisis in Gaza. The fact is Israel has restricted fuel supplies in response to the terrorism emanating from Gaza but continues to provide the Palestinians with electricity.

The Times of London omits this vital fact altogether in a story headlined "Darkness falls on Gaza as Israel takes revenge for rocket attacks". AFP, while quoting Israeli officials, also omitted the facts leaving readers with the impression that Israel is simply denying responsibility.

While Gazans are undoubtedly suffering, the dark picture painted by the mainstream media is different from the reality. As the Israel's Foreign Ministry notes, the supply of electricity to Gaza from the Israel and the Egyptian power grids (124 Megawatts and 17 Megawatts respectively) has continued uninterrupted. These 141 Megawatts of power represents about three quarters of Gaza's electricity needs.

Israel Electric Company workers' committee chairman Miko Zarfati goes further:

"This is Palestinian spin. No one has stopped the supply of electricity to the Strip," Zarfati told Ynet. He claimed that his employees worked day and night in a power plant in Ashkelon while putting themselves in danger of being hit by Qassam rockets falling in the area.

The Gaza power plant only produces 30% of the electricity consumed in the Strip while Israel supplies the rest.

"It is simply offensive and arrogant for them to claim that there is shortage," Zarfati said....

"The situation is totally absurd. We're continuing to supply them electricity despite the (demand) overload for electricity in Israel and despite the fact that Israeli residents and Electric Company workers that are being sent to Gaza Vicinity communities are under threat from Qassam rockets," Zarfati railed.

Ha'aretz also reports that despite the blackout in Gaza City, southern and central Gaza - which receive electricity from Israel and Egypt directly - were not affected by the shutdown.

Hamas manipulation of the media is evident in an AP story that reported "Children marched through dark streets holding candles, an angry Hamas TV announcer shouted at the camera "We are being killed, we are starving!"

Once again, the mainstream media has wittingly or unwittingly fallen into the Hamas trap. By plunging Gaza into darkness, the terrorist organization has managed to shift the story away from its own responsibility for the Qassams and terror on Sderot. Instead, Israel's image is taking a beating for a perceived humanitarian crisis of Hamas's own making.

Please correct the stories from The Times and AFP by writing to letters@thetimes.co.uk and http://www.afp.com/english/afp/?pid=contact respectively.

Also write to your local media outlets if you feel that they are not giving sufficient context and information to this story. Full contact details for many media can be found on HonestReporting's website.

Source: www.honestreporting.com

Golden Rule Islam

by Bill Warner

Islam's apologists say that Islam just needs a reform. After all, Christianity and Judaism have been reformed. But the apologists never get around to saying what the reform would be.

There are many kinds of reform possible to Islam, but does anyone care if they reformed prayer by praying towards LA rather than Mecca? No. The only thing that kafirs care about is how Islam treats us. We want our treatment changed. We want political Islam reformed.

Islam's treatment of us can be found in one word--kafir. The Koran says that a kafir (unbeliever) can be robbed, killed, tortured, mocked, insulted, beheaded, raped, crucified and on and on. The Hadith and the Sira agree with the Koran. Every single reference to the kafirs is negative, offensive and hateful.

The word "kafir" illustrates both of political Islam's principles--submission and duality. The Trilogy (Koran, Sira and Hadith) says that every kafir in the world must submit to political Islam.

The Koran also establishes dualism with its ethical system. A Muslim is not to kill another Muslim; a kafir may be killed, or not. A Muslim is not to lie to another Muslim; a kafir may be deceived or not. And so on. Islam has one set of ethics for Muslims and another set of ethics for the kafir--dualistic ethics.

The later political Koran written in Medina frequently contradicts the early religious Koran written in Mecca. The Koran gives a rule for removing the contradiction by saying that the later Koran "abrogates" the early Koran. But the earlier Koran is still true; it was given by Allah. So in Islam both sides of a contradiction can be true. This gives Islam its dualistic logic. Our unitary logic says that if two things contradict, then one of them is false

This dualism accounts for the two types of Muslims--the good Muslim at work and the Taliban Muslim. Both Muslims are "real" Muslims. Dualism gives the "good" Muslim plausible deniability when they say that jihadists are not "real" Islam. Dualism means the "good" Muslims and the jihadists are just two ends of the same stick.

The Koran, Sira and Hadith are filled with demands for all kafirs to submit to Islam. Kafirs can submit by joining the religion or submit by being a dhimmi (an apoligist). Either way, the Koran constantly demands that all kafirs submit to Islam.

So what kafirs want to reform about Islam is its principles of political submission and duality. What principle can be used to reform Islam? The key is how Islam treats the "other"--the kafir. The Golden Rule tells us how the "other" is to be treated. Every culture in the world has the Golden Rule as part of its heritage. But not Islam.

So what happens if we apply--treat others, as you want to be treated--to political Islam? All of the hurtful, hateful and harmful duality and submission disappear. What is amazing is how much of the Islamic doctrine goes away. About 61% of the Koran disappears. The Sira loses 75% of its words and 20% of the Hadith vanishes.

And those figures are low. All of the abusive words about women would go away as well. So the above reductions would be even bigger.

The Golden Rule even changes Hell. Islamic Hell is primarily political. Hell is mentioned 146 times in the Koran. Only 9 references are for moral failings--greed, lack of charity, love of worldly success. The other 137 references to Hell involve eternal torture for not agreeing that Mohammed is right. That is a political charge, not a morals failure. Thus 94% of the references to Hell are as a political prison for dissenters. The Golden Rule would empty the political prison.

Think how wonderful a Golden Rule Islam would be. No arguments, demands, accusations, law suits, threats, pressure, hateful speech, killings, or bombings. A Muslim could even be a true friend to a kafir. Islam would develop a sense of shame and admit to the terrible suffering of the 270,000,000 kafirs killed in jihad. A Golden Rule Islam would ask forgiveness about all the suffering of the dhimmis. A Golden Rule Islam would also admit to running the slave trade in Africa by killing and capturing the slaves they sold to the white slave traders.

Women would not have to be beaten and wear the hijab or burka. Honor killings would stop. Muslims could join us in the human race.

But all of those wonderful thoughts vanish when you realize what else it would mean to Islam. Mohammed had only 150 followers in Mecca after preaching the religion for 13 years. But when he went to Medina and became a politician and warlord, he conquered all of Arabia in 9 years by averaging a violent event every 6 weeks.

Duality and political submission were the principles that gave Islam its victory. Why would Islam drop the only principles that yielded success? Duality and political submission have crushed the world that believes in the Golden Rule.

CSPI (Center for the Study of Political Islam) could produce a Koran, Sira and Hadith that would use the Golden Rule. It would be a thin volume, but what Muslim would buy it?

OVER 60% OF GAZA CITIZENS BELOW THE POVERTY LINE

"The average wage in the Gaza Strip is NIS 1,690 ($419) a month for a
full time position (NIS 76 per day) (roughly $18.85), compared to an
average wage of NIS 7,920 (roughly $1,964) paid in Israel (NIS 360 -
roughly $89 - per day, including part time workers)." (Ynet News,
10/17/07) The data was collected in the Palestinian Authority by the
New Family organization.

The data also showed, that the average monthly wage among
Palestinians in the West Bank is NIS 1,720 (roughly $426) a month.
206,000 Palestinians are unemployed - a total of 23.6% of
Palestinians from the territories who are part of the workforce
(workers and job seekers). According to the study, 63.1% of Gaza
residents live below the UN poverty line.

The question that arises is, "Where do the hundreds of millions of
dollars in international support to the Palestinians go?" Surely if
they went to the poor, the situation would be different! But we all
know where the money goes... it's just that no one wants to say it
out loud for the fear it will then have to be acknowledged and acted
on. Interestingly enough, yesterday, the trial of the Holy Land
Foundation ended in a mistrial, as the jurors were not able to reach
a unanimous verdict for the members of this organization, suspected
of financing terrorist organizations.

"Kill the apostates wherever you find them..."

You know them. The kind of folks who get saved, talk the talk for a period of time (sometime for many years) and then all of a sudden bam - they're gone. I don't like to label people, but in the church world they're known as "backsliders".

Anyhow, so what do we do when people backslide from the Lord? Well, at most we don't associate with them. This is what the New Testament teaches.

Now I beseech you, brethren, mark them which cause divisions and
offences contrary to the doctrine which ye have learned; and avoid
them. Rom. 16:17

How does Mohammed teach backsliders should be treated? Read this:


"Ali was raised by Mohammed from the age of ten and became the fourth
caliph. Ali pronounced the following on lies and deception.

B9,84,64 When I relate to you the words of Mohammed, by Allah, I would
rather die than bear false witness to his teachings. However, if I
should say something unrelated to the prophet, then it might very well be a lie
so that I might deceive my enemy. Without question, I heard Mohammed say,
"In the final days before Redemption there will emerge groups of foolish
youths who will say all the right things but their faith will go no
further than their mouths and will flee from their religion like an arrow.

So, kill the apostates wherever you find them, because whoever does
so will be rewarded on Judgment Day."

And while you're at it, check these one out, too:

A Muslim can swear a false oath by any other god and not be accountable.

B8,73,73 Mohammed: "A Muslim who swears a false oath by the god of
another religion is not obligated to fulfill that promise because he
cannot be bound by a faith he does not hold."

In Islam something that is not true is not always a lie.
B3,49,857 Mohammed: "A man who brings peace to the people by making
up good words or by saying nice things, though untrue, does not lie."
An oath by a Muslim is flexible.

B8,78,618 Abu Bakr faithfully kept his oaths until Allah revealed to Mo-
hammed the atonement for breaking them. Afterwards he said, "If I make
a pledge and later discover a more worthy pledge, then I will take
the better action and make amends for my earlier promise."
When deception advances Islam, the deception is not a sin.

B5,59,369 Mohammed asked, "Who will kill Ka'b, the enemy of Allah and Mohammed?"

Bin Maslama rose and responded, "O Mohammed! Would it please you if I killed him?"

Mohammed answered, "Yes."

Bin Maslama then said, "Give me permission to deceive him with lies so that my plot will succeed."

Mohammed replied, "You may speak falsely to him."